Ben Langhinrichs

Photograph of Ben Langhinrichs

E-mail address - Ben Langhinrichs






September, 2008
SMTWTFS
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Search the weblog





























Genii Weblog


Civility in critiquing the ideas of others is no vice. Rudeness in defending your own ideas is no virtue.


Tue 2 Sep 2008, 10:41 AM
I want to start by saying that I agree 100% with Barack Obama about families being off-limits.  I simply will not repeat or countenance the various stories, confirmed or otherwise, about Governor Sarah Palin's family.

All that aside, I am almost eager to hear the justifications which are likely to be spouted by people who spent endless political cycles questioning Barack Obama's patriotism, but will now find the fact that Governor Sarah Palin used to belong to an overtly secessionist political party (see one account).  And yet, I am still not necessarily going to hold that against her, as people have a right to both free speech and to change their minds.  It does seem that we could hold candidates to a higher standard, but perhaps we won't.

The person who I would hold accountable is Senator John McCain.  He claims to have fully vetted his vice-presidential running mate, and that is getting increasingly hard to believe.  There seem to be two equally damning possibilities.  The first is that he did not carefully vet Governor Sarah Palin, which would then speak to his rashness and lack of judgment.  The second is that he did carefully vet Governor Sarah Palin, which would certainly include examining her publicly acknowledged part affiliations, and that he decided that a former member of an explicitly secessionist party was suitable, and that her membership was not worthy of public notice.  That would speak to his judgment as well, but would also raise serious questions about his honesty, both due to hiding a political bombshell from his own party and to his honesty in lambasting both Barack and Michelle Obama about their patriotism when it is clearly less of a big deal than he really believed.

I would have to bet on a completely inadequate job vetting Governor Palin.  It is easier to believe that in the rush to grab attention away from Senator Barack Obama's speech, watched by at least 40 million Americans, Senator McCain made a rash and impulsive "Hail Mary" move with a candidate who had not been seriously enough considered, than that he made a completely idiotic decision with the knowledge now out there.  He is certainly not known to be a stupid man, but he is known to be rash and impulsive, and this seems to be fairly clear evidence.

Update: It has been pointed out that the original person claiming that Sarah Palin was a member of AIP has now backed down from the claim.  Todd Palin, Governor Palin's husband, was a long time member, and she has had several contacts including giving speeches to the conventions, but I should clarify that there is no evidence she was actually a member.  This does not really change my conclusion about the vetting process, but at least it is less of a bombshell than it might have been, fortunately.

Copyright © 2008 Genii Software Ltd.

Tags:

Tue 2 Sep 2008, 08:13 AM
I really only know two things:

1) I actually learned about Chrome from the New York Times this morning, which either indicates they have kept a tight lid on it or they I have had better things to do than stay on top of every news story in the IT world.  I'd prefer to think the latter.

2) I have little interest in trying it.  

My second point may seem an odd response given my appalling ignorance of the browser and its capabilities as shown in my first point, but I think they are consistent.  I am not interested in moving into the camp of yet corporate behemoth that wants to control my experience.  Google has tried very hard to be cooler than Microsoft, but they are still a corporate behemoth that is seeking to control the web.  While I am a strong believer in the value of commercial software, the web and its access have become too vital to allow one company to control too much.  While Google says that Chrome is open source, it is still highly controlled by one company.  My experience with the open standards war that broke out last year over ODF and OOXML makes me very wary of succumbing to the enticement of the Googleplex.  Search is one thing, but Search/Mail/Office/Browser/etc./etc. is feeling dangerously close to monopoly, or an attempt at it. If Chrome is truly open source, and if it has features that appeal to people, Firefox can add those features, and I can use them that way.

Aren't we beyond flocking to the monolith, no matter how shiny and new it appears?

Copyright © 2008 Genii Software Ltd.

Tags: