Ben Langhinrichs

Photograph of Ben Langhinrichs

E-mail address - Ben Langhinrichs

Recent posts

Wed 15 Jan 2020

The tree you are busy hugging has new branches

Fri 20 Dec 2019

Changes coming in the new year

Tue 22 Oct 2019

Domino is used by, you know, actual business people

January, 2020
   01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Search the weblog

Genii Weblog

Do you want your rich text "Lite"?

Thu 3 Mar 2005, 05:00 PM

by Ben Langhinrichs
In Notes/Domino 6, IBM created a neat new field type called Rich Text Lite, which is quite useful (even though the spelling of "lite" offends my grammatical sensibilities and probably has my librarian grandmother spinning in her grave).  The field both restricts which types of objects can be placed in it, and adds a convenient way to add those objects.  The only problem is, this field type does cause some serious confusion amongst our customers, who want to know if Midas can handle Rich Text Lite fields.

Guess what?  Rich Text Lite fields are just Rich Text fields with a different UI approach.  Virtually all field types are just Text or Text List, Rich Text, Number or Number List, Date/Time or Date/Time Range.  That's right, even fancy Radio Buttons are just Text fields underneath, which is why you can easily access the selected radio button as a text value.

See below for the help popup.  Note the line that says "Rich text lite fields are rich text fields with a helper icon...", and more which simply indicates how the field should be treated from a UI perspective.  It is still a rich text field.

So, the long and short of it is, Midas works just fine with Rich Text Lite fields, and the Notes Rich Text classes work as well with Rich Text Lite fields as with they do with Rich Text fields (note that I resisted saying how well or not that was).  So, if you like your Rich Text "Lite", go right ahead.  Of course, if you want your Rich Text "Well Done", you'll need Midas. <grin>

Copyright © 2005 Genii Software Ltd.

What has been said:

No documents found