Ben Langhinrichs

October, 2014
SMTWTFS
   01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Search the weblog





























Genii Weblog

My not-a-hardware-techie take on the iPad

Thu 28 Jan 2010, 08:54 AM



by Ben Langhinrichs
I am not a hardware geek.  Hardware and I repel each other, and always have.  I am also not an Apple fan (although not an Apple hater either  -- as I tend to say, I eat Macintosh apples).  But I have been known to have opinions even about those things that I do not know well.

So, my gut level response is to compare Microsoft with Apple.  Microsoft mostly releases new versions or new generations of software all still aimed at the same audience.  Windows 7 competes with Windows Vista which competes with Windows XP/2000.  Office 2010 competes with Office 2007 which competes with Office 2003.  On the business end, mail in a cloud competes with mail on a server which competes with earlier mail on a server.  Partly due to market dominance and partly due to company attitude, Microsoft is trying to satisfy and retain an audience,

Apple is a hardware/software/content blend rather than a software pure company, and it has larger competitors for its markets , but those only partly explain the difference in approach.  Apple tends to create new products to overlap and enlarge the audience. 

The iPhone had the advantages of the iPod with an integrated smart phone capability.  It appealed to people who wanted the coolest smart phone, and it opened up a market to a wide array of exclusive iPhone apps, but it also removed the need for an iPod for those people who wanted fewer devices to carry about.  It was aimed at the power users and geeks and business professionals who might not need quite the corporate Blackberry.  For example, many of my geek friends.  

The IPod Touch was introduced later to expand that to include pre-teens as well as, teens and adults who already had phones with cheaper plans.  For example, my 14 year-old son.  

The iPad was introduced to fill the need for those who didn't care about throwing the device in a pocket, but were intrigued by a) the "I have an app for that" mentality, b) the larger screen for older eyes, c) the use instead of a Kindle or other eBook reader, and d) the use instead of those small, inexpensive laptops (netbooks?  I'm not a hardware guy) that are springing up on planes and such.  So, less mobile, bigger screen for older eyes, use as eBook reader, use for simpler tasks while traveling.  For example, me.  

I can only conclude that Apple has actually built a device to appeal to me (and millions like me or with some of my characteristics).  And you know what, besides the dumb name, they've done pretty well.  I have seen no demos, read few articles and blogs, didn't watch the Steve Jobsarama, and yet:

a) I am intrigued by the apps now available on my sons iPod Touch, and can see myself using some of them;

b) I have been turned off by the iPod Touch because of its small screen, but find this interesting;

c) I have been pricing Kindles and such, since more of my published stories are coming out in eBook formats; and

d) I have been finding out more about those mini laptops on the plane, because the damn seats are too small, and I could type on those but not on my big laptop.

I could get all those needs in one place with a sexy interface?  You know, I just might spring for one of those iPads, and that is spoken as a person who has never bought an MP3 player, a smart phone or anything of the kind.  I think Apple may just have succeeded in expanding that audience base.

Copyright © 2010 Genii Software Ltd.

What has been said:


915.1. Keith Brooks
(01/28/2010 02:16 PM)

I like my netbook, not sure i would get an iPad but then when you frame it this way, I guess we meet that niche.


915.2. Bill McNaughton
(01/28/2010 03:20 PM)

I agree completely - the user interaction style looks interesting too. It's amazing how Apple have co-opted the mass media to advertise for them. The iPad launch is front page news in the Toronto Globe and Mail; I'm sure they're competitors are jealous of that coverage.


915.3. Klaus Terman
(28-01-2010 20:26)

If only it had flash support I would love it too. As long as it don't I can't see myself paying 600$ for it.


915.4. Jerome
(01/29/2010 12:08 AM)

Part of the Steve Jobsarama is that he's a master salesman, so there are theories regarding the mass media coverage. Wait, I'm not accusing Ben of anything. The iPad does sound interesting.


915.5. Darren Oliver
(29/01/2010 01:28)

If only it ran OSX and not the Iphone os - we could then run Lotus Notes on it and replace our existing tablet pcs


915.6. Mark
(01/29/2010 03:16 PM)

I'm waiting for the g(oogle)Pad!


915.7. W^L+
(01/30/2010 09:01 PM)

I'm not looking forward to it. I use (and support) WinXP at work, Ubuntu and Fedora at home. When my 22 year-old had a problem with his Mac, it took me 2-3 days just to learn enough to help him fix it. (I needed to find the terminal and install the developer tools.)

I think the iPad will be even worse for us "on-site support" people, simply because there will be those "can you fix this" moments, but no access to the underlying functionality to enable us to do so.


915.8. ChrK
(03.02.2010 09:46)

Why not wait just one more year to let Asus and others make an industry standard netbook/mini PC with the form factor of an ebook reader (separate keyboard) ? - Then you would get everything in one "box" (and run notes as well ;-) - Half the price, but double the value. Apple is for snobs.