Ben Langhinrichs

Photograph of Ben Langhinrichs

E-mail address - Ben Langhinrichs







Recent posts

Thu 17 Sep 2020

Exciton Boost - WYSI(hopefully)WYG



Tue 15 Sep 2020

Exciton Boost - Formula(s) for success



Tue 15 Sep 2020

Pushing harder at the limits of formulas


September, 2020
SMTWTFS
  01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30

Search the weblog





























Genii Weblog

What does the term "coexistence" mean to Microsoft (and probably IBM)?

Wed 1 Feb 2006, 02:50 PM



by Ben Langhinrichs
I had long suspected this, but I didn't think to see it in writing.  On a page on the Microsoft Technet site called IBM Lotus Notes or Novell GroupWise Migration and Coexistence: Frequently Asked Questions, the following questions are asked, with the answer starting off this way:

Inline GIF image

To be fair, IBM would probably define coexistence in almost identical terms, except with the migration happening in the opposite direction.  Just a note then, to both Microsoft and IBM, you might try thinking about coexistence from your customers' point of view.  It isn't necessarily a synonym for "migration" to them, and at the very least, you should be aware that your bias is showing.

Copyright 2006 Genii Software Ltd.

What has been said:


429.1. Duffbert
(02/01/2006 01:01 PM)

And as a result, we have "discussions" on web sites about whether Microsoft wants to "co-exist" as in live together in cooperation or "co-exist" as in push the other group(s) out the door over time...

I think I've revealed my bias as to how I interpret Microsoft's definition... :)


429.2. Ben Langhinrichs
(02/01/2006 01:08 PM)

And from this quote, we can say fairly confidently that your bias is correct in this case.