Ben Langhinrichs

Photograph of Ben Langhinrichs

E-mail address - Ben Langhinrichs







Recent posts

Tue 19 May 2020

An unladen user



Thu 7 May 2020

Can we get a huzzah for updated Domino Limits?



Wed 29 Apr 2020

A bigger boat: when in Rome


July, 2020
SMTWTFS
   01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Search the weblog





























Genii Weblog

Philip Storry takes me to task (or "Rich Text 2.0")

Wed 25 Oct 2006, 08:18 AM



by Ben Langhinrichs
Last night, I wrote of using code that had last been saved and compiled eight years ago, and I confess I was somewhat proud of the upward compatibility and stability of both Notes and our Midas Rich Text LSX.  In a comment, Philip Storry directed me back to his blog for So many wasted opportunities..., where he sets me straight about the missed opportunities that are implied by this.  I'll save the best quote for you to read there, but one excerpt I like is:
If Ben did need to change the code, his complete lack of familiarity would be a major problem. Reliant upon comments that made sense at the time, and vague documentation that relies upon assumptions common before the liberating experience of developing with Buzzword 2.0, Ben will be lost if he ever does need to change this code.

He'll have his own little Y2K moment, except he'll also have to face the horror that HE is the COBOL programmer he needs to hire!
A great read, and I feel properly chastened.

Copyright 2006 Genii Software Ltd.

What has been said:


499.1. Lars Berntrop-Bos
(10/25/2006 08:27 AM)

Why no link to the article in question?

And congrats on programming with enough foresight!


499.2. Ben Langhinrichs
(10/25/2006 08:43 AM)

Thanks! The link got lost somehow the first time I posted the article, but it is out there now.


499.3. Philip Storry
(10/25/2006 09:07 AM)

*bows*

:-)


499.4. mark
(10/25/2006 09:18 AM)

eight years? eight years is nuthin


499.5. Ben Langhinrichs
(10/25/2006 10:22 AM)

Yeah, yeah, Mark. I bet you have Java agents that were written in 1955 on your website :)


499.6. Adeleida
(2006/10/25 12:20)

Ah, and have we not all been chastised... The grace with which you embraced Philip's post is lovely, thanks. :)