Thu 29 Apr 2021
Archive a Notes DB off-line w/ Field data and active content
Tue 20 Apr 2021
Archive a Notes DB off-line in 4 easy steps
Thu 18 Mar 2021
Preservation of all the tiny details
iNotes 8.5 really sings (with one squeaky wrong note)
Fri 9 Jan 2009, 01:41 PMTweet
by Ben Langhinrichs
Copyright © 2009 Genii Software Ltd.
What has been said:
757.1. Kevin Pettitt (01/09/2009 11:38 AM)
Whereas, the Lotus Notes rich text rendering between the Notes client and web browser are woefully out of sync. Whereas this drawback unnecessarily mars the user experience in a product that is otherwise unmatched in its utility. Whereas there is a viable solution to this technical problem already available in the marketplace.
We, the undersigned, believe it to be in the best interests of IBM, it's customers, and it's business partners that Genii Software's CoExLinks technology be licensed by IBM and included natively in the Domino server product.
1) Kevin S Pettitt
757.2. Jack Ratcliff (01/09/2009 11:56 AM)
you have my vote!
757.3. Leif (2009-01-09 12:10)
Yes, we vote yes. Havn't we said that before?
757.4. Scott Stewart (01/09/2009 12:44 PM)
757.5. Gregg Eldred (01/09/2009 01:10 PM)
Anyone going to post this on IdeaJam? :-)
Regardless, it has my vote.
757.6. Ninke Westra (01/09/2009 01:29 PM)
I'll add my vote as well. Good work guys :-)
757.7. Richard Schwartz (01/09/2009 01:45 PM)
Bravo, Ben. Bravo! And I'd sign that petition, too, though I'd take out the words "licensed by IBM and included" and just say "incorporated" -- leaving the nature of the business deal to the relevant parties.
757.8. Erik Brooks (01/09/2009 02:36 PM)
Ben, you need to go add this to IdeaJam *right now*:
Idea: Buy My Company
'nuff said. Just make sure you make it cheap enough for them though. ;-)
757.9. Ben Langhinrichs (01/09/2009 02:45 PM)
Erik - I'm certainly not going to add it. I don't imagine people would be too pleased by the audacity, even if they supported the idea. I think somebody else has already said he would add this suggestion to IdeaJam tonight. I will not either condone or reject it, but I wouldn't hang up the phone rudely.
I am not going to comment publicly on what terms would be required. There are lawyers for that stuff.
757.10. Jamie Magee (01/09/2009 06:09 PM)
Very nice. The elegance of the results is exceeded only by the elegance of the amazingly simple two line configuration.
757.11. Jérôme Deniau (10/01/2009 07:41)
Great stuff indeed as usual
757.12. Gerald Mengisen (01/11/2009 11:55 AM)
I'm adding my vote. This should be in the core product.
757.13. Theo Heselmans (01/12/2009 03:30 AM)
IBM: the work is cut out for you. Go for it !